We are entering the integrated era
The new reality
A lot of things have fundamentally changed how users work today. Applications, data, and user identities have moved to the cloud, branch offices connect directly to the internet, and many users work off-network. This has given users an unprecedented ability to access, create, and share information online, which has concomitantly increased the risk of them exposing sensitive information. Additionally, advanced attackers have matured beyond the traditional defense models that rely on a patchwork of point solutions – they no longer rely on a single attack technique, and instead use multipronged approaches that may combine email phishing, fileless malware, and malicious websites.
Practitioners must protect against internet-born threats, phishing attacks, have control and visibility into their endpoints, and be able to quickly respond to incidents that arise – that’s a tall order for many reasons. First, the average enterprise has 75 security tools running in its environment. Second, most of these tools don’t communicate with one another. The sheer volume and complexity associated with responding to this information overload while simultaneously trying to correlate disparate datasets across multiple disaggregated sources is daunting. Security teams often find themselves drowning in a deluge of data and facing unmanageable workloads that make it nearly impossible for them to do their jobs well. This leaves them feeling overwhelmed and unmotivated, and further undermines cyber risk management by increasing the likelihood of them not responding to the threats that matter most fast enough, or missing them altogether. Additionally, 79% of respondents in Cisco’s 2019 CISO Benchmark Report said it was somewhat or very challenging to orchestrate alerts from multiple vendor products. To paraphrase, this implies that 79% of the security community does not view ‘Frankensteining’ multiple point products together as a solution to their problems!
Now, don’t get me wrong – I love animals, am an avid fan of the Ringling Brothers, and think that one-trick ponies getting together is abso-friggin-lutely adorable. But frantically moving from console to console while correlating disparate threat data is a myopic approach that doesn’t solve the underlying problem. The inconvenient reality is that there always are and always will be threats to respond to, and with attack surfaces continually growing, the problem is only getting more complex. The only way to stand up to advanced attacks is by taking a highly integrated architectural approach to security.
Successful security integrations require a minimum of these 5 things – everything else will fail sooner or later:
1. Comprehensive coverage – Platforms that cover major threat vectors, like web and email security, span across all endpoints, and integrate with network security tools.
2. Intelligence sharing & automated response – Actionable threat intelligence that is shared amongst all incorporated solutions for data enrichment purposes, so that responses are automated (rather than ‘suggested’) and if a threat is seen once anywhere, it is immediately blocked everywhere.
3. Centralization – Features and capabilities that allow users to consolidate information from multiple solutions on a single pane from which they can dynamically pull observables about unknown threats and kick off investigations.
4. Improved time to remediation (TTR) – Proven ability to significantly reduce TTR to enable SecOps teams to work more quickly and efficiently, thus decreasing likelihood of an incident becoming a full-blown breach.
5. Reliable integration – Integrations that wouldn’t disappear because one company changed their mind regarding their strategic direction or got acquired.
Security that works together for the integrated era
Fortunately, at Cisco, we foresaw this paradigm evolution years ago and invested in building a seamlessly integrated security platform across our SIG, email security, endpoint security, and advanced sandboxing solutions, along with our network security tools like IPS and NGFW. Backed by Cisco Talos – the largest non-governmental threat intelligence organization on the planet – real-time threat intelligence is shared amongst all incorporated technologies to dynamically automate defense updates so that if a threat is seen once, it is blocked everywhere. Teams can also kick off threat investigations and respond to incidents from a single console via Cisco Threat Response (CTR), which is a tool that centralizes information to provide unified threat context and response capabilities. In other words, Cisco’s integrated security portfolio, underscored by Threat Response streamlines all facets of security operations to directly addresses security teams’ most pressing challenges by allowing them to:
◈ Prioritize – SecOps teams can pinpoint threat origins faster and prioritize responding to the riskiest threats in their environment.
◈ Block more threats – Threat Response automates detection and response, across different security tools from a single console, which allows SecOps team to operate more efficiently and avoid burnout.
◈ Save time – Threat intelligence from Talos is shared across all integrated tools, so that you can see a threat once and block it everywhere.
As the largest cybersecurity vendor in the world, only Cisco has the scale, breadth and depth of capabilities to bring all of this together with Threat Response – and best of all, it’s FREE! Cisco Threat Response is included as an embedded capability with licenses for any tool in Cisco’s integrated security architecture.
Let’s compare the following two scenarios:
Scenario 1 – A patchwork of non-integrated security tools:
Security teams must review alerts from multiple solutions, correlate disparate datasets from various disaggregated sources investigate each threat. They triage and assign priorities, perform complex tasks with tremendous urgency with the goal of formulating an adequate response strategy based on situational awareness and threat impact, potential scope of compromise, and the criticality of damage that can ensue. This process is laborious, error-prone, and time-consuming, requiring an analyst to manually swivel through multiple consoles quickly. We’ve run internal simulations, in which all of this on average takes around 32 minutes. SOC analysts are left drained and high-severity threats risk being overlooked.
Scenario 2 – Cisco’s integrated security platform:
Security teams see an aggregated set of alerts from multiple Cisco security tools in Threat Response’s interface. The alerts are automatically compared against intelligence sources, SOC analysts can visualize a threat’s activities across different vectors, kick off an investigation, pinpoint the threats origin, and take corrective actions immediately – all from a single console. In our internal simulations this took 5 minutes.
Bottom line: Cisco’s integrated portfolio with Threat Response brings the time it takes to deal with a potential threat down from 32 minutes to 5 minutes, which is 85% faster than the non-integrated patchwork scenario!
Posts
